October is NDVAM

I know it’s just barely September, but preparation involves advance notice, and so I’m here to talk about October—National Domestic Violence Awareness Month. You’ve probably seen and read and heard a lot about verbal and physical violence against women lately—conversation about sexual assault (especially on college campuses) and the new domestic violence policies in the NFL have been center stage. There’s a lot you can do to educate yourself about what’s happening in your community and communities around the nation and world—this month, next month, and every month.

Are you a student? Think and talk about the violence against women on your campus.
Are you employed? Think and talk about the violence against women in your workplace.
Are you a voter? Think and talk about the violence against women in your government.
Are you a sports fan? Think and talk about the violence against women perpetrated by professional male athletes.
Are you a person of faith? Think and talk about the violence against women in your sacred texts, your denomination, your congregation.

Where I live, the organization my family and I routinely support is the Community Resource Center—check it out, especially if you’re in San Diego.

Wherever you live, somebody is working to end violence against women and children. You can, too. Start with these websites if you don’t know who the changemakers are in your community. 
Find out what you can donate, when you can volunteer, to whom you can listen, to whom you can speak out. Let me know what you find.

www.ncadv.org
www.nomore.org
www.ncdsv.org 
www.thehotline.org 
www.incite-national.org 
www.futureswithoutviolence.org

www.vday.org 

Taboo dinner table conversation, as usual.

Lately (read: always) I have been doing a lot of thinking and reading about politics and religion. At my internship site, Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, there is a new discussion/study/reading/activism group forming around ideas for new ways of advocacy in/from the church. It's a handful of interesting people, all of whom understand that there is more to scripture than just reading -- there's a serious call for doing. [Theology sidebar: Don't you dare say anything about works righteousness. We're not talking about action as requirement for salvation, we're talking about action as a visceral response to the grace in which we now stand. Just so we're clear.] They want to figure out for whom to advocate and how to advocate without the congregation crying partisanship. It's such a fine line to walk, because as soon as you talk to religious folks about anything remotely related to government, they go nuts about separation of church and state. Which is hilarious, because talking at church about eradicating poverty has absolutely nothing to do with establishing a theocracy.

In addition to the reading I'm doing for this advocacy group, this week I picked up Jim Wallis' book God's Politics, which he published in 2005 as a response to totally insane religious polarization in America surrounding George W. Bush's reelection. It's a really interesting look at what the prophets of our scripture were calling their communities to act upon, and how similar our struggles for peace, freedom, equality, and justice still are to this day. He and I don't agree about everything (he's anti-choice, but strives for civil conversation on the subject [as opposed to bombing Planned Parenthoods], which is nice) and the religious landscape of the Democratic Party has changed a little bit with President Obama, so some of his claims about the lackluster left have been improved upon since he wrote them. But the polarization of American "values voters" is still stark and still tragic.

In Bible study recently, we talked about how religious folks in this country argue at the top of their lungs about some pretty minute discrepancies in our interpretations of scripture (homosexuality, abortion, women in ministry) so that we don't have to address the deeply theological issues of poverty and peace.

It's easier to complain about "welfare queens" than it is to admit that we don't have a clue how to make sure our society's most vulnerable people are fed and clothed and sheltered, and way easier than admitting we just don't want to pay for it.

It's easier to picket at Planned Parenthood than it is to let individual women make health care choices that are different than ours, and way easier than admitting that the system we uphold keeps most women from access to the same resources we have.

It's easier to rally around nationalism and supporting the troops than it is to admit that a former President cowboy-ed us in to an unjust war, and way easier than admitting that the United States of America is not in charge of the entire world.

It's easier to yell about 9/11 and terrorism and freedom than it is to admit that we don't know any better than to fight evil with evil, and way easier than admitting we routinely act out of our fear.

It's easier to protest what exists than it is to offer alternatives for what could be the new American paradigm.

And because we are the people of a book of prophets and wisdom and freedom and grace, it is our responsibility to be the voices for the people who continue (thousands of years and miles later) to be the downtrodden and the outcast of our social order. It is not our job as Christians to take away the rights of people who are different from us, simply because we're afraid of our social status changing, and crying "abomination" is easier than crying out for justice.

It is safe to say that I am outspoken about how my religious tradition and political affiliation interact. And as we barrel toward this Presidential election, my voice is going to get exponentially louder in every possible venue. The next two months are not about saving face and keeping people who "don't want to talk about politics" or "don't think politics belong at church" from feeling uncomfortable. Your privileged comfort is not my priority. Hell, my privileged comfort is not my priority.

I saw President Obama speak at CSU yesterday afternoon. To be frank, it was a little underwhelming. I was hoping for the inspiration I felt in 2008 to make a resurgence. It's pretty likely that you know that I am an Obama superfan, so it has zero to do with him as a President. It was just like ten million degrees out and Kelsey didn't make it in in time, and I couldn't really see him very well and nobody around me actually seemed very "fired up and ready to go" either...there's just not the tenacity there was last time.

And my disappointment is also in the fact that many people whom I love and respect do not appreciate the gravity of the situation. They are a bunch of upper-middle-class white males, to be honest, and so they don't have as much at stake in this election (or at least they don't think they do). And I'm planning to spend the next two months getting aggressive with them if I have to.

I don't even plan to hide behind euphemisms like "think about who you're voting for" -- my goal is to re-elect President Barack Obama because to do otherwise is to send this country careening down a path to destruction. I do not believe that President Obama is the savior of this nation (no matter how much I would like him to be) and I also do not believe that any Administration can flip a country upside down in four years. And I know that some of my most liberal friends will wax poetic about third party candidates and I hear you -- I really do. But right now, a vote for a third party just hurts progress, because we're not at a point where third party candidates actually have a shot. Quite frankly, it's a vote for Republicans. And most importantly, I do believe that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan would try their hardest to make sure that this nation works for them and their race and their gender and their tax bracket only.

There's no time to say "Barack Obama didn't do everything he said he'd do, so I'm not re-electing him" or "The economy is still awful so I'm not re-electing him" or "We're still at war so I'm not re-electing him" or "He's just politics as usual so I'm not re-electing him" or "He didn't support the Occupy movement so I'm not re-electing him" and do you want to know why? Because the alternative to the hope and the change is MITT ROMNEY AND PAUL RYAN, the two Americans least interested in anything that you stood for in 2008 and anything that you think Obama no longer stands for in 2012.

A vote for the Republican Party (whether for President or for Congress) is a step in the wrong direction. Don't agree with me? Tell me why. And if Jesus is part of your life, tell me where Jesus is pro-rich and pro-war and anti-woman and anti-gay and all the things that show up on the GOP platform.

I dare you.

Oh! And if you are even close to letting the words "my vote doesn't matter" out of your mouth, don't even bother speaking to me about this election. On one level, you're absolutely right because one vote does not sway the entire election. But thousands (millions?) of people believing their vote doesn't matter (and therefore not casting their vote) suddenly sways an entire election. You have to be part of the solution.

And if you live in a state that "always" votes one way or the other, you may feel like it doesn't matter if you vote or not. But if you skip the Presidential election, you skip local elections. And local elections are where all sorts of policy actually get enforced. It's where nut job Governors and Mayors and City Councilmembers suddenly do things like ban the teaching of evolution in schools and allow police to pull over non-white drivers on the suspicion that they're undocumented. And you skip some Congressional elections, and you allow people like Rep. Todd Akin to serve on the House Committee on Science while he doesn't even know the finer points of human anatomy.

I digress. Please. Vote. I'm begging you.

One voice can change a room.
And if it can change a room, it can change a city.
And if it can change a city, in can change a state.
And if it can change a state, in can change a nation.
And if it can change a nation, it can change the world.
Your voice can change the world.

Senator Barack Obama
December 9, 2007

A House Divided

The First Book of Samuel

All three readings facilitated this sermon, so take a minute to follow those links and read them. <3
---
We talk about family a lot, here at church. The family of God, the Bethlehem Lutheran family, our own families, etc. I really identify with this image because, boy, have I got a family. Every year on Christmas Eve, dozens of us gather to celebrate together—our tradition is 87 years old and we’ve never missed a year. The attendees are my mom’s dad’s family—four generations of Turpins under one Los Angelino roof. When someone brings a significant other to Turpin Christmas Eve, you know they’re in it for the long haul, because you don't subject just anybody to the hugs and the questions and the food and the drinks from every aunt, uncle, and cousin.

In today’s Gospel story, Jesus asks, “Who are my brothers and sisters and mother?” We’ve got those relations down, but occasionally we have to ask, “Who are my cousins and who are their sisters and brothers and mothers?” Since we can hardly keep it all straight, we’ve abandoned modifiers like “half” and “step” and “second” and “once-removed.” Everyone’s a cousin or an aunt or an uncle. Those details are irrelevant to us. And I like to think that Jesus is making a similar claim, here. His biological mother and brothers are at the door, yet he looks around him, to a crowd of people not regarded as desirable family members—as usual—and proclaims that all are his mother, brother, sister, cousin, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew—kindred, every one.

Jesus exemplifies here that families do not fit in boxes. Families are communities of love—blood relatives, certainly, but friends and neighbors. Family does not have to mean Mom, Dad, 2.5 kids, dog, picket fence. Family is step-moms and half-sisters and two dads and foster parents and single parents and great-uncles-twice-removed. Jesus’ family is always expanding, and therefore, so is ours.

This is all very lovely, until your family—your community of love—becomes dysfunctional. Communities of love are torn apart by abuse, divided by prejudice and fear. Communities of love cannot remain intact with these sins and evils among them. Jesus tells us in this Gospel story that a house divided against itself cannot stand; a kingdom divided cannot stand; a family divided cannot stand; a community divided cannot stand.

We in the United States are familiar with division. In this, a most divisive election year, party lines are clearer than ever (Maybe even among our own families?). In 1 Samuel, the Israelites are in a similar predicament. They’re in need of a new king, they say, and neither Samuel nor any of his sons are the men for the job. I admit that I am no Old Testament scholar—but I learn from a very good one, and he taught me that many of the greatest Old Testament stories are those of turning points. This story in 1 Samuel is one such turning point.

You’ll recall that the Israelites repeatedly fall in and out of favor with their God—and very often for how they choose to govern themselves. They’re always demanding this or that or that someone should or should not be their god or be their king. And they always forget that pesky part where God insists He serves as their heavenly king.

Jeanyne Slettom, a great process theologian, says about this God/empire dichotomy that, “Empire colonizes in the geographic sense, but also in the construction of our desires and the manipulation of our fears. Empire is finding ultimacy in anything that is not God. Empire is an external power that conquers us—by coercive or deceitfully seductive means. God, on the other hand, is a creative and persuasive power that saturates our being and emanates from within.”

Over and over, the Israelites fall victim to the allure of empire. Over and over, Americans fall victim to the allure of empire. Over and over, you and I fall victim to the allure of empire—within our communities, within our governments, within our denominations, within our businesses, within our families, within our own selves. We live in a world of choice and avoidance and distraction.

Here in the United States we are Republicans and we are Democrats and we are Independents and we are Libertarians and we are exhausted. “The system is broken,” we cry. And we’re all correct—the system is broken. In this nation, we hold tight to our two-party system. We just love that dualism—male/female, rich/poor, young/old, white/black, documented/undocumented, slave/free, heterosexual/homosexual, progressive/conservative, right/wrong, in/out. 

And just as the crowds in the Gospel of Mark have demonized Jesus—literally declared him possessed by Satan—so our empire has demonized any of these we regard as “other.” We are, without a doubt, a kingdom divided. And while we perpetuate this cycle of institutional and systemic sexism, racism, classism, and all the other -isms under the sun, we have fallen victim to the allure of empire, once again.

In this nation, this community, among whom Jesus still walks and to whom God still speaks, what have we demanded be our kings and our gods? What have we put first? Things. We’ve put first things – money things, and power things, and we have put first our fear of people and our hate for people and our distrust of people and things that are not us and are not our money or our power or do not lead us immediately to more money or more power. Some of us have even demanded that our democratically-elected government be our kings and our gods. Some of us have expected our President to be the savior of this nation in its time of great economic hardship. Some have demonized our President as the catalyst for the fall of our American empire. And among all of these things we have not once remembered Christ, the king.

Christ, the king who eats and drinks with sinners and prostitutes and tax collectors—the marginalized of his time. Christ, the king who recognizes these people and all people as his family. Christ, the king who rules not by condemnation and oppression and exclusion but by love and empowerment and inclusion. Christ, the king whose words were not welcome in his divided community. The words of a prophet do not come to a community who has everything together. Christ came to a broken world to a broken community of broken people. And by his words and by his life and by his death and resurrection he made them whole. God has made us whole and makes us whole and will make us whole.

So, “do not lose heart,” the Apostle Paul has written, which is lucky, because I was about to. This could be our turning point.

What happens to the dichotomy of God and empire when we look at the “outer” and “inner” natures Paul presents as our past selves—baggage aplenty—and our becoming selves—the “us” that can exist if our future relies not on the seductive power cycle of empire, but on the transformative power of God? What if rather than fall victim to the allure of empire, we allow ourselves to be lured by the power of God? With God, our inner nature is being renewed, day by day, moment by moment—renewed by the grace of God through Jesus, the Christ. So do not lose heart!

And as Paul has written, “we have believed and so we have spoken”—we as believers are called out of that belief, out of that grace so freely given to us, we are called out to proclaim the gospel of Jesus the Christ to the world. The Gospel of community of love. The gospel of family. The gospel of the creative and transformative power of God. The gospel of unity—not uniformity. The gospel of hope and love and freedom and life.

Do not lose heart in this weary world, my brothers and sisters. You are being renewed by the power of the Holy Spirit daily by your baptism into this, the family of Christ. This community of friends and neighbors. And finally, remember that Martin Luther tells us that we are simultaneously saint and sinner—constantly in the process of life and death, renewal and sustenance in this united kingdom of God.

Amen.